“Woe to the one who quarrels with his Maker — An earthenware vessel among the vessels of earth! Will the clay say to the potter, ‘What are you doing?’ Or the thing you are making say, ‘He has no hands ?’ Woe to him who says to a father, ‘What are you begetting?’ Or to a woman, ‘To what are you giving birth?”
“Naturalistic explanations will be discovered in ‘simple, undirected processes that are ‘yet unexplained.”
Behold, the stunning “Evo’ Credo.”
This is evolutionists’ answer promising an answer. Bruce Lee called this “The art of fighting without fighting” (“How do you keep a dummy in suspense?’— ‘how do you keep a dummy in suspense”— etc…). This wit only goes so far. If it can’t all be brought together, the last hope is for something overwhelming to occur; something vindicating embattled science, adding perpetuity to the increasingly post-Christian consensus proudly standing before this information-jammed population to tie it in a bow.
“For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to the yoke of slavery.” †
[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he progressive acquiescence of some well-intending Christians promoting fusion of evolution with the Biblical narrative may look like the olive branch handed to the disciples of Scientism — but even then, you will be mocked for “Copping Out” as displayed in this 2006 quote by Richard Dawkins:
“If God wanted to create life and create humans, it would be slightly odd that he should choose the extraordinarily roundabout way of waiting for 10 billion years before life got started — and then waiting for another 4 billion years until you got human beings capable of worshiping and sinning and all the other things religious people are interested in.”
“But the natural man receives not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
1 Corinthians 2:16
Photograph of Charles Darwin; the frontispiece of Francis Darwin’s The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (1887)“The Ghost Of Science Past”
Despite the false half-concession plays seen — that they’re “not necessarily trying to omit God” — it’s exactly that. Darwin and his legacy essentially trapped science within an undetermined, naturalist philosophy. Progeny to his pseudo-science has overrun academia dictating —“ad populum”— what science is.
1 Corinthians 15:39
“All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.”
James M. Tour
“It’s no use for Darwinists to trot out the standard ‘party line’ that ‘even if we don’t yet understand how it happened, we still have enough evidence to infer that it happened.’ At the very most, all that the current scientific evidence could establish is the common descent of living organisms. But that’s not “macroevolution.” Macroevolution requires more than a common ancestry for living organisms: it requires a natural mechanism which can generate the diversity of life-forms we see on Earth today from a common stock, without the need for any direction by an Intelligent Agent. But the mechanism is precisely what we don’t have evidence for. So the question remains: ‘why should we believe in macroevolution?’
“I simply can not accept it as unreservedly as many of my scientist colleagues do, although I sincerely respect them as scientists. Some of them seem to have little trouble embracing many of evolution’s proposals based upon (or in spite of) archeological, mathematical, biochemical and astrophysical suggestions and evidence, and yet few are experts in all of those areas, or even just two of them. Although most scientists leave few stones unturned in their quest to discern mechanisms before wholeheartedly accepting them, when it comes to the often gross extrapolations between observations and conclusions on macroevolution, scientists, it seems to me, permit unhealthy leeway.” – Professor James M. Tour – one of the ten most cited chemists in the world: “A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution.”
Follow Up By Dr.Vincent Torley
In a part of a follow-up article after accusatory responses: “When Professor Tour publicly declares that no scientist alive today understands the chemical details behind macroevolution, he is not espousing the naïve reductionist line that ‘explaining macroevolution is a matter of ‘chemistry’; rather, he is simply pointing out that in order to properly assess the feasibility of Darwinian macroevolution as a theory, we have to ascertain whether it is chemically feasible. If, for some reason, certain macroevolutionary transitions appear to be highly improbable from a chemical standpoint, then that in itself is a good reason to be skeptical of the view that Darwin’s theory of evolution is an all-inclusive theory of biology”
“Macroevolution, Microevolution and Chemistry: The Devil Is In The Details”
It’s become clear: explaining Evolution is the “turn,” following the Darwinian “pledge” past its combined proponents’ awareness prepping the world audience for the “prestige.”
Richard Dawkins: Scientism at its best
Evolutionists’ Deity: “E.T.“
We have Richard Dawkins’ statement on the Ben Stein video “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed“: “Well… it could come about in the following way: it could be that uh, at some earlier time somewhere in the universe a civilization evolved — probably by some kind of Darwinian means to a very, very high level of technology and designed a form of life that they seeded onto… perhaps this planet.”
“Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” 2008
Dr.Dawkins is referring to “Directed Panspermia
“: the theory of intentional spreading of seeds of life to other planets by an advanced, extraterrestrial civilization: an alien narrative upgrade of “Exogenesis.” Making Contact
” with the proverbial aliens
would be celebrated, worldwide. Directed Panspermia-theorizing evolutionists would point up: “I told you, they started all of this, and now they’re here to help!”
The disturbing element is the obstruction of big-picture logic, despite professed “intellect”; they are conveniently gaffing off the predated ridiculum — of endless biological regression — to accommodate a successor of grand usurping theory. The appearance of other biological organisms, more intelligent or not, cannot explain ultimate origin.
Even if they were our estranged “space brothers,”
at best, they are relatives having made their nest among the stars.
Such a level of extravagance invested, overlorded by Directed Panspermia, simply adds another rung in an infinitely-regressing DNA spiral while providing no explanation for causation; we bear witness to order, “on a knife’s edge,”
in our “constants and quantities,”
as William Lane Craig
has stated; a personal,
” is responsible. Remember, Professor Tour explained how even after all this time, resource expenditure, and technological applications, evolution proponents cannot explain the naturalistic mechanism they suggest is responsible for macro-evolution: then, they simply stretch their mandate for more bigoted railing: “God is a fairy tale
now suggesting, “aliens did it.”
Understatement Of The Millennium
Since pop culture has enthroned — now deified — the late Stephen Hawking, maybe the same should consider what he stated in 2009 (at the Origins Symposium at Arizona State University) about the appearance of “alien” visitors… even though he made a 180-degree turn, afterward: “If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans, it makes sense for them to exploit each new planet for material to build more spaceships so they could move on. Who knows what the limits would be?”
Follow The Bread Crumbs
Originally, Hawking zeroed in on their need to utilize our resources to build vessels; but we see them all the time: the jig is up. The black budget backtraces. The people under the stairs have craftily-run basement operations to build technopathically-operated vessels; now after the land your house rests upon but can’t get that, covertly. They simply emerge from behind the veil gaining instant access through “contact,” overtly going to work making what is yours, theirs — and many will give to the cause of “unity” & “peace.” At such point, the whole of historical programming is proven: having laid the groundwork; built the platform; yet “aliens” wouldn’t require permission according to their narrative; it just so happens engineered, meatsuit-wearing demon energies masquerading as “space brothers” do. Unfortunately for those who rail, “don’t insert God, he’s a “myth!”— it will not be God that changes your mind.
The Last Dance
The world is being programmed to peer into space, “out there among the stars,”
for no less than salvation.
That ever-shunted message objectively-focuses on scientifically, historically, and philosophically crippling anything
to do with Biblical subject-matter. The [Biblical] narrative of life will, at the prophesied advent, be revealed exactly why it’s ever hostile to the Matrix: it is the
most credibly embattled obstruction to the coming deception. We bear witness to the lockstep, watching & waiting devils, purposeful ectropy
of technology ebbing toward the attic of evolution: Transhumanism —
heralded to elude sickness and death — when it connects Man to the demons and sirens of the old world — permanently. Ask yourself, “why all the billions, even trillions, are being spent to escape the so-called “natural” processes?”
Evolution proponents have spent much of time and resources on the past, but from what we are seeing, it’s the generationally-programmed future involving our professed need to take “the next step
,” cross-culturally prepping mankind for techno-speciation
through spiritual integration. This is, allegedly, moving us “to safety”:
from pandemics, war, monotheistic conflicts, philosophical disputing, genetic predispositions, impending cosmic/geological events, and any other fear intensified to induce the requisite panic: “run for the fence
.” The long-view-organized spirit of fear flows, generating a terrifying cascade to disengage God-given intuition.
Is the self-saving consensus enlarged so much Man has chosen to put down its own humanity? Directed Panspermia is unraveling as the religious amalgam having used science for incubation. Biology cannot infinitely regress: it was only able to stage the second biggest question, “Who is between us and the answer?”